When trying to understand how much the person leading the SPA earns, one encounters a persistent misunderstanding: most articles confuse the president of the association with the general director. The former is elected, while the latter is a salaried executive. Two roles, two radically different compensation systems. This discrepancy alone explains why figures circulate inconsistently on the subject.
Volunteer President or Salaried General Director: A Confusion That Distorts the Entire Debate
The SPA is a recognized public utility association. Its statutes specify that the administrators, including the president, perform their duties on a voluntary basis. The president of the SPA does not receive a salary. This is a point that most online results ignore or skim over.
See also : Everything You Need to Know About Surveyors' Salaries in 2026 and Their Evolution
The operational management is entrusted to a salaried management team. The general director is an executive under a work contract, with a fixed salary and a variable component. When discussing the salary of the president of the SPA, we are actually referring to the package allocated to this operational management.
This distinction changes the interpretation of the figures. A volunteer president may receive expense allowances (travel, accommodation during missions), but these reimbursements are not related to a salary. The confusion arises because the president publicly represents the association, while the general director manages the budget, shelters, and employees on a daily basis.
Further reading : Everything You Need to Know About the Salary of Veolia's CEO: Figures, Bonuses, and Comparisons
Compensation of the General Director of the SPA: Documented Amounts
L’Express revealed that the position of general director of the SPA comes with a fixed salary of 110,000 euros gross per year, supplemented by a variable component of at least 35,000 euros. This level of compensation places the position in the high range of the French non-profit sector.
Le Monde also documented an episode of dismissal deemed without real and serious cause, which highlighted the advantageous contractual conditions negotiated by the management. These revelations fueled an ongoing debate about the consistency between fundraising appeals and the compensation levels of salaried executives.
What the Variable Component Covers
The variable component, set at a minimum of 35,000 euros according to published information, is linked to management objectives. The exact details of the allocation criteria are not known, but in the non-profit sector, these objectives generally focus on budget control, adoption rates, or resource development.
Combined with the fixed salary, the total compensation can exceed 145,000 euros gross per year. For an association that relies heavily on public generosity, this amount raises questions about proportionality, not legality.
Financial Control and Transparency of SPA Accounts
The SPA publishes a detailed financial report every year: income statement, balance sheet, annex, and breakdown of personnel expenses. This obligation arises from regulations concerning organizations appealing to public generosity and the oversight exercised by the Court of Auditors.
These documents allow for indirect verification of the weight of executive compensation relative to the overall budget. One can identify the total payroll, the number of executive managers, and the share of operating expenses in the collected resources.
What You Can Verify Yourself
- The annual accounts are accessible on the SPA’s official website, in the section dedicated to financial transparency
- The breakdown of personnel expenses is included in the annex to the income statement, allowing for the situating of management costs relative to expenditures dedicated to animals
- The Court of Auditors periodically publishes reports on recognized public utility associations, including observations on governance and compensation
Consulting these documents remains the only reliable way to cross-check the figures presented by the press. The amounts published by L’Express correspond to a specific moment and may have changed since.
Why This Controversy Regularly Resurfaces Regarding SPA Compensation
The topic resurfaces during each governance crisis or change in management. The reason is structural: donors fund an animal cause, not the salaries of executive managers. When a perceived gap appears between the stated mission and the compensation conditions, trust erodes.
In the non-profit sector, opinions vary on this point. Some believe that hiring a competent general director to lead an organization managing dozens of shelters and employing several hundred staff justifies compensation aligned with the market. Others argue that an association living off donations should implement a stricter cap.
The Real Lever: Governance, Not the Amount
The issue is not so much the figure as the decision-making process. Who determines the salary of the general director? The board of directors, composed of elected volunteer administrators. The transparency of this process, the publication of the criteria for allocating the variable component, and effective oversight by internal bodies determine the legitimacy of the package.
- An independent compensation committee within the board of directors would enhance the credibility of the system
- The voluntary publication of the exact amount of the general director’s compensation in the annual report would go beyond legal obligations
- A cap on the ratio between the highest salary and the median salary of employees would send a strong signal
These mechanisms exist in other large French associations. Their adoption at the SPA depends on the willingness of the board of directors and the pressure exerted by donors.
The next time the topic resurfaces, one can verify for themselves by consulting the published accounts. The president’s volunteer status is a statutory fact, while the general director’s compensation is a governance choice: mixing the two prevents any serious analysis.